The show what I watched over the weekend, was the catch up of this week's Masterchef. And what a week! Dropped souffles, harsh critics, tears and the worst dish possibly ever served up on the show. Why I like and watch this show is still a bit of a mystery to me, after all it is just another cookery show. So like a modern take on a classic dish, I thought today's blog should be a 'deconstruction of why I like Masterchef'.
Masterchef is a cookery competition for amateurs. Rounds include 'invention tests', where the contestants have no idea what ingredients they will be using, working a service in a top restaurant and off course cooking 3 course meals off their own design. Masterchef judges Chef John Torrode and greengrocer's son and all round geezer, Greg Wallace, whittle these contests down until eventually a winner is crowned.
First thing I must say is that the Masterchef of today is miles apart from the bland version in the 80s and 90s. I really hated this era as it was incredibly elitist, condescending and patronising. Presented by Loyd Grossman a bunch of smug bastards proceeded to make meals with 40 word titles which Grossman and a guest chef would proceed to eat and use very long words to describe. The set was bland, the pace slow and it was as exciting as grey paint. In 2005, it was relaunched, taken out of the studio and given some oompth! One of the best changes was replacing the up tight Grossman with John and Greg.
John and Greg are 2 very likeable people and work really well together. The balance of a chef judging food (John) and a punter (Greg) works really well and leaves scope for arguments and disagreements, (although not in a nasty way), about what makes a good dish. But it's their on screen chemistry which makes the show as these 2 really do bounce off each other and are obviously good friends off screen.
This was demonstrated with great effect in last year's Masterchef. At the beginning of each episode is a brief montage of the series and explanation of what the competition is, this is usually ended with Greg, deadpan, shouting, (one criticism maybe that they do tend to shout at each other, rather than talk!), 'cooking doesn't get tougher than this'. I don't think this was meant to be a catchphrase, but stuck and is used each series. Last year after Greg delivers this line serious and deadpan as ever, however after a little pause he ends it with a cheeky wink and a broad smile to John. John just falls apart and bursts out laughing. I liked this as the show kicked off with a bit of fun and you can see these two work well together. It was obviously not meant, but was kept in and I for one are glad they did.
The contestants too are much better now. Gone are the snobs and gastric bores and in their place are 'normal' likeable people. Yes we laugh when they mess up a simple dish, (it always amazes me how often they serve undercooked potatoes!), we point and go 'ha ha, it didn't happen to me'. But then, we applaud as the amateurs produce some simply stunning plates of food. Over the years Michelin star quality dishes have been produced, (you may think I'm exaggerating, but when a Michelin star chef tells the contestant such, I believe them). Also, usually, they're damn nice people to boot and you genuinely want them to do well. This year is no exception.
We were, this week, at semi final stage. Going into this round, the red hot favourite was a young chap called Larkin. He has produced great looking and elegantly flavoured Asian dishes, using advanced techniques and processes. Quite simply he was head and shoulders above the rest. But this is Masterchef and you can crash just as quickly as you rise to the top. Larkin nearly fell through the bottom of my TV!
In a 'real kitchen' challenge, Larkin decided to bake a Lemon Tart, sounds nice and if Larkin had remembered to switch the oven on, it probably would have been very tasty! Fortunately he had time to switch the oven on, bake it at a far higher temperature than it should be and get it out, although the end result was too heavy and overdone.
For the challenge of cooking for the critics, Larkin decided to do a chocolate soufflé. Very yum! Now the danger of doing a soufflé is the failure of it to rise properly. Masterchef could do a whole series of failed soufflés! Fortunately for Larkin they rose perfectly, unfortunately the ramekin slipped out of his tongs and he launched it across the room.
Larkin really should have learned that soufflés were not his thing. Previously in the week he had attempted to do a soufflé in a hollowed out mango. Again it rose, again it slipped out of his buttered up tongs! The end result was a creamy gloop of soufflé next to a melted gloop of ice cream. It was definitely the worst plate of food ever seen on Masterchef and this was further compounded by the fact that this round was judged by Michelin star chef, Marcus Wareing, who made sure Larkin knew this fact and refused blankly to even try it!
Fortunately for Larkin, his previous efforts were enough to see him get a place in the final. He's joined by Dale, who had an equally disastrous round with Marcus Wareing, whose razor clam dish was met with an equally razor like rebuke from Wareing. Actually the criticism was very harsh and Dale broke down in what was one of the very few awkward and uncomfortable moments in Masterchef history. Greg ended up consoling Dale and fair play to Greg, showed us that yes this is a competition, but there is still a human side to it. Dale recovered fantastically and made the best dishes of the final challenge. Narrowly beating cheesy quaver and DJ Natalie, who is the most improved cook of the series and has hit top form just at the right moment.
So I like Masterchef for many reasons and the fact this week's final is too close to call is the icing on a well baked cake. Who will win? I think Dale will sneak it but it's so tight between them, picking a winner 'doesn't get tougher than this'.
Masterchef The Final is this week on BBC1, check listings for details.
The Show What I Watched
Monday, 29 April 2013
Friday, 26 April 2013
Question Time
The show what I watched last night or rather, the show what I grew progressively angry with last night was Question Time.
Hosted by David Dimbleby, Question time is a weekly show in which members of the public are invited to ask questions to MPs. All 3 main political parties are usually represented and the 4th member of the panel is usually not politically affiliated with anyone. The 4th member, in truth, can be a bit hit and miss. If they are a broadcaster or writer, then it's usually ok, but if it's a TV 'personality' or someone from TOWIE, it can be a bit cringeworthy as you watch them try to bluff their way through topics they know nothing about or have any interest in. For this reason they are usually more in touch with people than the politicians.
I have 2 reasons why Question Time gets me angry and neither of them is the program's fault.
Firstly, in the 80's, when politics in the UK had teeth and personalities, any questions asked would normally go along the lines of this:
A question would be asked, maybe 'why are all the pits closing?', the Conservative MP would make a statement. The Labour MP would argue completely the opposite, no matter how daft it sounded or how ludicrous it was. The Lib Dem would take a stance in between the Tory and Labour viewpoint and an argument would break out amongst them. The 4th member, Ben Elton, would make a 'right on' remark followed by a knob gag, laughter ensues, everyone settles down and prepares themselves for the next question.
It could be entertaining, which, even though they're serious issues, is a good thing as it engaged the audience and got people to think about and get involved with the debate.
The problem today is that politics is bland and ministers are too busy creating sound bites, toeing the party line and not saying anything too controversial. Therefore, question time now follows this pattern:
A question is asked, the Conservative MP gives the party's answer, being very careful not to stray from the prepared answer. The Labour MP takes an ever so slightly different approach and gives a Tory lite response, being careful not to stray from the party line. And the Lib Dem, being careful not to offend their coalition partner, give another version of a Tory lite response. Joey Essex claims he doesn't even know what deficit means but as long as he can keep bleaching his teef and 'aving a spray tan once a day, then fack it!
These type of responses brings me onto my last point as to why Question Time makes me angry. If the question involves an answer that would be too controversial or puts their party in a bad light, they just don't bother answering the question. For example:
'What does the panel think about today's figures which shows we are back in recession. Will they now admit that plan A just isn't working?'
'Dave Smug-Bastard?'
'Well I think the question your audience member was trying to ask is the real issue of how I like my eggs in the morning? I happen to agree with a recent report which says 70% of people like them with a kiss'.
Foot through telly, invoice sent to the House of Commons and a letter written to the BBC asking them to change the name of the show to Avoid The Question Time.
Question Time is on every Thursday at around 10.35pm on BBC1.
Hosted by David Dimbleby, Question time is a weekly show in which members of the public are invited to ask questions to MPs. All 3 main political parties are usually represented and the 4th member of the panel is usually not politically affiliated with anyone. The 4th member, in truth, can be a bit hit and miss. If they are a broadcaster or writer, then it's usually ok, but if it's a TV 'personality' or someone from TOWIE, it can be a bit cringeworthy as you watch them try to bluff their way through topics they know nothing about or have any interest in. For this reason they are usually more in touch with people than the politicians.
I have 2 reasons why Question Time gets me angry and neither of them is the program's fault.
Firstly, in the 80's, when politics in the UK had teeth and personalities, any questions asked would normally go along the lines of this:
A question would be asked, maybe 'why are all the pits closing?', the Conservative MP would make a statement. The Labour MP would argue completely the opposite, no matter how daft it sounded or how ludicrous it was. The Lib Dem would take a stance in between the Tory and Labour viewpoint and an argument would break out amongst them. The 4th member, Ben Elton, would make a 'right on' remark followed by a knob gag, laughter ensues, everyone settles down and prepares themselves for the next question.
It could be entertaining, which, even though they're serious issues, is a good thing as it engaged the audience and got people to think about and get involved with the debate.
The problem today is that politics is bland and ministers are too busy creating sound bites, toeing the party line and not saying anything too controversial. Therefore, question time now follows this pattern:
A question is asked, the Conservative MP gives the party's answer, being very careful not to stray from the prepared answer. The Labour MP takes an ever so slightly different approach and gives a Tory lite response, being careful not to stray from the party line. And the Lib Dem, being careful not to offend their coalition partner, give another version of a Tory lite response. Joey Essex claims he doesn't even know what deficit means but as long as he can keep bleaching his teef and 'aving a spray tan once a day, then fack it!
These type of responses brings me onto my last point as to why Question Time makes me angry. If the question involves an answer that would be too controversial or puts their party in a bad light, they just don't bother answering the question. For example:
'What does the panel think about today's figures which shows we are back in recession. Will they now admit that plan A just isn't working?'
'Dave Smug-Bastard?'
'Well I think the question your audience member was trying to ask is the real issue of how I like my eggs in the morning? I happen to agree with a recent report which says 70% of people like them with a kiss'.
Foot through telly, invoice sent to the House of Commons and a letter written to the BBC asking them to change the name of the show to Avoid The Question Time.
Question Time is on every Thursday at around 10.35pm on BBC1.
Thursday, 25 April 2013
The Bill
The show what I watched last night was The Bill. No, it's not back, but the original series is being shown on Watch. It wasn't a particularly good episode, but it did remind me of an annoying trait I have.
On Watch we are circa 2007 and a quick tour of Sun Hill Police Station you'll notice some familiar faces. DS Hunter, oh yes that's Jack Branning in Eastenders. That's DI Manson, who is he? That's right Frank from Coronation Street, he raped Carla, what a tosspot!
Hey, that's Gary Lucy, off Hollyoaks 'fame' and what's that show? Footballers Wives. There's Becca, (Hollyoaks), Ruby, (Eastenders). Who was her dad in Eastenders.... Oh yeah DS Don Beech! Wow soap land really is incestuous.
Oh dear, look, it's Gillian Taylforth, best known for her role as head bobber on a motorway hard shoulder and Kathy Beale in Eastenders. Wasn't she married to Phil. I heard Steve McFadden likes to watch dogs or something.
And so it goes on.....
If you haven't guessed, my annoying trait is I can't follow the bloody story in shows, like The Bill, because every few minutes I'm saying 'oh what's he been in' or 'isn't that the one who played so and so?'.
A few weeks ago Dirty Den took time off from his webcam business to appear and Arthur Fowler rose from the grave as a lag who just been released, (convicted, I assume, after a retaliation to being hit in the face with a frying pan by Pauline).
There is a new sergeant and for an entire episode I was distracted with, 'where've I seen him before?' I knew he played a vicar, I'd seen it recently, his mother was played by the oxo mum...... The Bill! That's it, he was in The Bill a couple of months ago, then they bring him back as a sergeant hoping we all have memories like a fish!
Fortunately for my condition, The Bill is no longer with us, but to the makers of Holby City and Casualty can I make a plea? Please stop recycling the same actors over and over again so I can go back to watching the program and stop trying to work out which advert he was in and what 'the show what I watched' had him in!
The Bill is on Watch weekdays at 9am and contains a lot of familiar faces.
On Watch we are circa 2007 and a quick tour of Sun Hill Police Station you'll notice some familiar faces. DS Hunter, oh yes that's Jack Branning in Eastenders. That's DI Manson, who is he? That's right Frank from Coronation Street, he raped Carla, what a tosspot!
Hey, that's Gary Lucy, off Hollyoaks 'fame' and what's that show? Footballers Wives. There's Becca, (Hollyoaks), Ruby, (Eastenders). Who was her dad in Eastenders.... Oh yeah DS Don Beech! Wow soap land really is incestuous.
Oh dear, look, it's Gillian Taylforth, best known for her role as head bobber on a motorway hard shoulder and Kathy Beale in Eastenders. Wasn't she married to Phil. I heard Steve McFadden likes to watch dogs or something.
And so it goes on.....
If you haven't guessed, my annoying trait is I can't follow the bloody story in shows, like The Bill, because every few minutes I'm saying 'oh what's he been in' or 'isn't that the one who played so and so?'.
A few weeks ago Dirty Den took time off from his webcam business to appear and Arthur Fowler rose from the grave as a lag who just been released, (convicted, I assume, after a retaliation to being hit in the face with a frying pan by Pauline).
There is a new sergeant and for an entire episode I was distracted with, 'where've I seen him before?' I knew he played a vicar, I'd seen it recently, his mother was played by the oxo mum...... The Bill! That's it, he was in The Bill a couple of months ago, then they bring him back as a sergeant hoping we all have memories like a fish!
Fortunately for my condition, The Bill is no longer with us, but to the makers of Holby City and Casualty can I make a plea? Please stop recycling the same actors over and over again so I can go back to watching the program and stop trying to work out which advert he was in and what 'the show what I watched' had him in!
The Bill is on Watch weekdays at 9am and contains a lot of familiar faces.
Wednesday, 24 April 2013
Emmerdale
The show what I watched last night was Emmerdale. Look, I was busy ok and it was the only show I had time to watch :)
For those freshly out of a cave, Emmerdale is a soap opera set in a Yorkshire village off the same name. If you're off a certain age or haven't watched it for several years, you may remember it as Emmerdale Farm. Back then the soap was pretty much centred on the farm but today is more focused on the actual village, giving it greater scope, more characters and intricate storylines.
I think this switch happened around the time of the plane crash which wiped out half the cast. One of my everlasting memories of the old Emmerdale Farm was a blinded Nick Tate shouting 'Archie, Archie'. Classic!
Last night's episode focused on the climax of a feud between Chastity 'Chas' Spencer (nee Dingle) (played by Lucy Pargeter) and her niece Debbie Dingle, (Charley Webb). This being soap land, Chas, off course, had an affair with Debbie's boyfriend, Cameroon, (insert actors names), Debbie, quite understandably, took offence to Aunty Chas' indiscretion. Do they talk it over? No. Do they ask someone in the family to mediate and maybe work towards some kind of compromise? No. Does Debbie kidnap Chas, drive her to a disused barn and threaten to blow her head off with a stolen gun? Like I said, this is soap land!
So the whole episode was will she won't she kill Chas? The answer I knew several days before this episode was aired and is a big fat no. If she had then it might have been difficult for Chas to be in next weeks episodes as per the TV listings and the accompanying photo of a live and well Chas in The Woolpack.
Knowing full well Chas was not going to be killed is rather like watching a recorded football match, when some bastard on Facebook has already revealed the final score. You watch it because you are interested, but there is non of that excitement or anticipation which heightens the experience.
Off course it's not Emmerdale's fault, maybe the TV mags should have left Chas out of next weeks edition, but in the age of 24 hour media and information, it would have been hard not have stumbled onto it. Also a main character like Chas would be a Christmas exit or would have been plastered on the front of all soap mags and the fact that the actress herself has not announced she's leaving, made last nights episode easy to read.
But that is not to take away anything from the episode, it was still gripping stuff. The transformation of Debbie's character from one dimensional goody two shoes to heartless scheming bitch has been brilliantly scripted and well acted by Webb. And if we all knew Chas would not die then someone should have told the actress as she looked shit scared! The tension and fear was very believable well acted by Pargeter.
In fact, for the heartache, fear, pain and betrayal portrayed by both of these actresses over the last 6 months, they should be applauded. Emmerdale has a strong cast, especially the women. Last night they proved themselves more than worthy of commanding big storylines and screen time and I'm sure will continue to dominate in the months to come.
Recently, Emmerdale overtook Eastenders in the ratings and its easy to see why. Eastenders has become all too predictable, dour and depressing. Emmerdale is fresh, has a light side and continues to challenge controversial issues, for example, last years storyline around assisted suicide was incredibly well done and opened up debates and challenged ideas.
So yes, the show what I watched last night was Emmerdale and I actually liked it. The sleepy soap about sheep sheering has matured and is coming of age. It's a must see serial drama for soap fans. As for Eastenders, well, I'll leave that rant for a future blog!
Emmerdale is on ITV1 and so often you're probably best consulting listings rather than me trying to type it all out!
Follow me on Twitter https://twitter.com/colhewobbles
Tuesday, 23 April 2013
Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares
The show what I watched last night was Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares USA. For those who haven't seen it, Ramsay is invited into failing restaurants to try to turn them around. Being Gordon Ramsay, he swears a lot big boy, throws things and swears a bit more. If you're a Ramsay fan, then you'll probably like this, or should I say you will like this once in a while. The problem with this show is it's too formulaic.
Each week is the same routine, just insert a different restaurant and people for Ramsay to shout 'fuck' at. We start the same way each week, with a restaurant that's failing, the owners are in complete denial and can't understand why they are not making money. In the meantime the diners are filmed complaining about the food, puking and getting e-coli. The owner still looks bemused.
Next Ramsay struts in, says 'fucking hell' within 10 seconds, (as he's contractually obliged to), shakes his head a lot and sits down to sample the menu. And the food is always shit. I mean always, no exception. He has never gone, 'wow, yum, the food's excellent, must be their prices or location'. Nope, he gets served shit, says so after each mouthful and then lays into the chef and owner for producing shit!
Then he watches a service and as always there is chaos, food going out late, being sent back and a lot of shouting. Ramsayat some point will then stumble into the fridge, discover everything is weeks out of date, rotting and has developed into a new lifeform. This useless piece of shit is then asked to form a government. Ramsaythen shouts a bit more and orders everyone to 'fucking clean it or fucking close down'.
The owners grumble, hate Ramsay, breakdown, like Ramsay, then agree to work harder. We are now at the half way point and you can set your watch by it.
They come back to the restaurant in the morning and are 'surprised' that Ramsay has given it a make over. This despite the fact he has done so over the last 100 or so shows. He then proceeds to show them the new menu which 'he' has personally designed. Everyone looks surprised, despite the fact this has happened in each of the last 100 shows!
The new menu is on the next service. This service always starts shaky but the team always pulls it round and at the end of service Ramsay will tell them how fucking hard they've worked, to keep working fucking hard and that he believes in them. He then leaves the restaurant and disappears up his own arse.
So you may have noticed I did not mention last night’s episode and frankly that is because it does not matter. The show followed the same linear path above and it will do next week and so on.
This is why I say if you like Ramsay,you'll like this, but only once in a while. The first time you watch it you will laugh, nearly vomit, laugh again and enjoy it. Week on week, however, it becomes samey and all too predictable. Sometimes less really is more.
Ramsay’s Kitchen Nightmare USA is currently on Channel 4, Mondays at 10pm and 4oD.
Follow me on Twitter https://twitter.com/colhewobbles
Follow me on Twitter https://twitter.com/colhewobbles
Monday, 22 April 2013
Game Of Thrones
The show what I watched last night was Game of Thrones on Sky on Demand. However, this episode was not from the current season (3). The reason, you see, is I have this annoying habit of being very slow to jump on the bandwagon. Hell, I'm lucky if I know the damn wagon existed!
For example, at the beginning of this year, I finally watched the first episode of The Sopranos! Yep only 14 years late to the party! Now in my defence, I missed the first few episodes of The Sopranos way back in ‘99 and thought it was one of those shows you have to watch from the beginning and so there was no point joining halfway through. There was no ‘On Demand’ back then, so if you missed it and didn't tape it you were screwed,(also chips were 'alfpenny and you could go to the cinema, have popcorn and a drink and still have change from a pound note). So year after year I would miss the repeats and I could never afford the box sets. However, finally I spotted Sky Atlantic was showing it from the very beginning and so I've started watching it.
Whilst I am on the subject of The Sopranos, last week I saw Season 3 Episode 2 and I really wish I had been forewarned that Livia Soprano was CGI’d for that episode,(unfortunately, the very fine actress, Nancy Marchand, who was just brilliant as the battleaxe, scheming Livia, died before season 3 was shot). The writers wanted to give some closure to Livia and Tony’s relationship, which I understand, but the CGI was just, well,freaky! Her head hovered, whilst her body stood still and it looked wrong. I really thought my local Pizza takeaway had been using Fly Garretts again! (Judge for yourself, actually it looks a bit better on a smaller screen, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeTJr7WiGmo)
Anyway,I digress, back to Game of Thrones and fortunately we now live in an On Demand era and when I saw Sky On Demand had series 1 and 2, I rubbed my hands and proceeded to clog up my Sky + box,(I've just realised I've mentioned Sky a lot, in the interests of fairness I should point out other TV service providers are available. Virgin Media,however,I wouldn't touch with someone else's).
So season 1, episode 1 was finally watched last night. A lot of fuss and critical praise has been heaped on this show and I must say after watching the first episode,I don't understand why. It is a little bit 'talky'. There just seems to be endless dialogue, with more dialogue and not a lot happening. Characters are introduced and there seems to be a lot of them, certainly too many in one hit for my tiny brain. Background after background stories are told, old alliances explained and re-explained and a dwarf gets a blowjob. Pretty run of the mill stuff on reflection.
In fact there is a lot of sex in the show. A lot more than anyone had told me was in it and as I was watching this with the girlfriend, led to a red face, (do your own jokes about getting red other things) and glancing at my phone a lot. I don't think I've managed to convince my better half that I did not see a single nipple because a) they appear rather often and b) my phone wasn't switched on.
Overall it was very slow paced and felt a struggle to watch. I keep getting told by people whose opinion I trust how good it really is and I doubt two further seasons would have been commissioned if it stayed this snail like. Had I watched episode 1 when it originally aired, I probably would not have watched episode 2. But this, you see, is the beauty of not being on the bandwagon and the finger being well and truly off the pulse. I can let others sort out the good from the Keeping Up Appearances and when I finally get my out of date arse around to finding them, I have a wealth of information as to whether or not I will like it. Will I like Game of Thrones, time will tell......
Actually it had a dwarf getting a blowjob for crying out loud, I’m going to love it!
Game of Thrones season 3 is currently on Sky Atlantic,Mondays 9pm.
Follow me on twitter https://twitter.com/colhewobbles
Follow me on twitter https://twitter.com/colhewobbles
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)